Hi Andrus, Are you still also using (and happy with) Apache Tapestry?
Just curious, - Patrick On Sep 18, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > WO in its binary form miraculously survived Java evolution for so many years. > Not knowing the details of Java 9, I can't say what the next workaround will > be, but I know there will be one :) > > But seriously, you should probably start looking at Apache Cayenne or other > alternatives. You may check my presentations from WOWODC last year on what it > takes to get there (TL;DR - no silver bullet, but a reasonable migration > path). > > Andrus > > On Sep 18, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Joseph Pachod <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> We're discussing how we/wonder could/would handle a new Java version not >> being backward compatible in regard to source code, as it has been rumored >> to be the plan for Java 9. >> >> As far as I've found, the source code of EOF/WebObjects is closed source, >> not accessible and not modifiable. Is this right ? >> >> If, for some reason, EOF/Wonder wouldn't compile any more against Java 9, >> what could be done ? Is it about a major rewrite or could it be "not this >> bad" ? Is there any plan? >> >> Thanks in avance >> >> Best, >> -- >> Joseph Pachod, Intuitive Healthcare Solutions >> Equipe Technique >> 08.11.69.63.86 >> http://bugreport.resurgences.com >> http://www.resurgences.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/pgr%40vt.edu > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
