And I forgot to mention this one: 3. "ajp-wsgi is significantly faster than flup's pure-Python ajp server." and "Oh well, I don't even use flup myself anymore. I've switched to ajp-wsgi..."
===8<==============Original message text=============== I didn't know about ajp-wsgi. Looks interesting. Thanks for the post. It's interesting to learn Allan Saddi's opinion (http://www.saddi.com/software/news/) on these things which may be of concern for web.py and its users: 1. "did I ever mention how much I hate FastCGI? Around the time I first released flup, I had transitioned my apps from FastCGI to AJP, and I never missed FastCGI since." For this, I have the same question as Erwin. It would be interesting to see if web.py can get a performance boost (and reasons for which Allan hates FastCGI, which is unclear to me) 2. "For users of flup's SessionMiddleware, I recommend Beaker." I remember seeing recommendations to use flup's session management with web.py on this mailing list. I know nothing about Beaker but it always sounds like a good idea to me to have a complete stack ... Jack Friday, October 26, 2007, 3:26:11 PM, you wrote: > Hi, > has one setup a webpy based web-application with Allan Saddi's ajp-wsgi > server? > Erwin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
