On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Dimi Shahbaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  I agree.  http://webpy.org/docs would be good if it was at least
>  *complete*.  My favorite entry:
>
>  http.py
>
>  prefixurl(base='') : Sorry, this function is really difficult to
>  explain. Maybe some other time.

If problems are only with lack of docstrings like this, then that can
be improved by writing docstrings.
Is that sufficient?

>
>  +1 for epydoc, and some more verbose documentation.

Does epydoc support markdown formatted docstrings?

If splitting documentation into module-wise pages solves the problem,
that can be done easily.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web.py" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to