Yeah, my bias tends to be against adding a whole other chunk of infrastructure. On the other hand, I've been bitten in the butt by the "I only need 10% of this, so I'll build my own thin version" path before....
I'll probably try celery. On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 5:37:29 AM UTC-5, Nickname wrote: > > Quoting "Bill Seitz" <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > > Is there a standard/preferred way to have an email (or 10 emails) > triggered > > by a user action without the user having to wait for the emails to > finish > > sending before getting confirmation? > > Either you relay the email sending to another process, e.g. celery. > > Or you do an async funtion inside your program, by using threads or > the multiprocessing module. > > Better ideas welcome, esp. that do not involve external components > such as celery! > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
