thx again for the review Julian.
Julian noted..
>
> On 2011-08-06 01:34, =JeffH wrote:
>> ...
>> 12. Removed any and all dependencies on
>> [I-D.draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-15], instead depending
>> on [RFC2616] only. Fixes issue ticket #12
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/12>.
>> ...
>
> Not sure this is a good idea.
>
> The current text copies a known bug from
> draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-15 (see
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1340>).
Fixed in my working copy: s/GET/OPTIONS/
> Also, the ABNF claims it's based on RFC 2616's definitions, but mentions
> RFC 3986 in ABNF comments. This needs to be checked.
Ok, checked it, found bugs (thanks), fixed in my working copy. Will certainly
need further review.
> Furthermore, there's a risk that HTTPbis will have to tune the
> definition of Effective Request URI furthermore -- see
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/222>. (I realize
> that's not your fault, but we somehow have to deal with this).
Agreed.
=JeffH
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
