#14: Effective Request URI definition issues
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/current/msg00473.html:
On 2011-08-06 01:34, =JeffH wrote:
...
12. Removed any and all dependencies on
[I-D.draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-15], instead depending
on [RFC2616] only. Fixes issue ticket #12
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/12>.
...
Not sure this is a good idea.
The current text copies a known bug from draft-ietf-
httpbis-p1-messaging-15 (see
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1340>). [ the HTTP
method in the example should
OPTIONS rather than GET ]
Also, the ABNF claims it's based on RFC 2616's definitions, but mentions
RFC 3986 in ABNF comments. This needs to be checked.
--
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: jeff.hodges@… | Owner:
draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: strict-transport-sec | Version: 2.0
Severity: - | Keywords:
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/14>
websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
