And he left out the URL that the message was about. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hallambaker-digesturi-02.txt
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > In response to comments on and off list, I have revved the draft to > produce a -02 > > * Have fixed the omission of the scheme and algorithm in > /.well-known/di/sha-256 > * Have changed the colon separating the algorithm and the digest to a > semi-colon on advice that some parsers will choke otherwise > * Have taken out the SHA-128 scheme and instead put in support for > truncation on an arbitrary 32 bit boundary. [This needs a security > consideration of course] > > I guess I should have added the acknowledgements section as well. > > > Stephen and I have had discussions off list. If all goes well this > should be the last version of this draft before we get to a merge. The > outcome that seems to be most likely to suit people's needs would be > to have two drafts. The first would just have the core syntax and > security considerations for using digest identifiers. The second would > have all the interesting stuff link locators and encryption and stuff. > Content-type would likely be in the second. > > I am going off to write some code. > > -- > Website: http://hallambaker.com/ > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/ _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
