Actually the proposal is to merge my proposal with the ni scheme made
by Stephen et. al.


I generally recon that if two independent proposals converge on
essentially the same thing it probably means it is on the right track.
At worst it is a necessary dead end that has to be explored:-)


On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Rahman, Akbar
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
>
> I read through your draft and it was quite interesting.  For DECADE, are
> you proposing to use your scheme for the naming of DECADE objects or for
> some other purpose?  Please excuse me if the question had already been
> discussed as I must have missed it.
>
>
> Akbar
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Phillip Hallam-Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 1:55 PM
> To: websec; [email protected]
> Subject: [decade] Updated, updated DIGEST spec
>
> In response to comments on and off list, I have revved the draft to
> produce a -02
>
> * Have fixed the omission of the scheme and algorithm in
> /.well-known/di/sha-256
> * Have changed the colon separating the algorithm and the digest to a
> semi-colon on advice that some parsers will choke otherwise
> * Have taken out the SHA-128 scheme and instead put in support for
> truncation on an arbitrary 32 bit boundary. [This needs a security
> consideration of course]
>
> I guess I should have added the acknowledgements section as well.
>
>
> Stephen and I have had discussions off list. If all goes well this
> should be the last version of this draft before we get to a merge. The
> outcome that seems to be most likely to suit people's needs would be
> to have two drafts. The first would just have the core syntax and
> security considerations for using digest identifiers. The second would
> have all the interesting stuff link locators and encryption and stuff.
> Content-type would likely be in the second.
>
> I am going off to write some code.
>
> --
> Website: http://hallambaker.com/
> _______________________________________________
> decade mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade
>



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

Reply via email to