-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/16/12 12:07 PM, Chris Weber wrote:
> Can we keep the document focused on the primary design goal - > controlling/preventing framing - and avoid lumping in other forms > of attack that might piggyback on such framing? Chris, just to be clear, are you objecting to acceptance of these documents as starting points for progression within the working group (i.e., do you think they are fatally flawed or not within the charter), or are you providing technical feedback on the assumption that they'll be accepted as working group items? Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+MYYkACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwmvQCglGJ8xp9AFFeKB63jxtGbVbuf qhwAoMLyg4tuDx12C/z/Apelb7MI7c9h =Dk8r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
