|
On 4/16/2012 11:14 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Chris, just to be clear, are you objecting to acceptance of these > documents as starting points for progression within the working group > (i.e., do you think they are fatally flawed or not within the > charter), or are you providing technical feedback on the assumption > that they'll be accepted as working group items? I think frame-options is flawed by even discussing itself as a protection against CSRF when it's primary function is to control and prevent framing. However I do believe this is within charter, so I'm merely providing feedback on the assumption that they'll be accepted. Best regards, Chris Weber |
_______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
