* Graham Klyne wrote: >On 13/02/2013 20:32, SM wrote: >> It's easier to fix the bug first. >> >> The following could be used: >> >> "When a new entry is recorded in the permanent message header field >> registry, IANA will remove any corresponding entries (with the same >> field name and protocol) from the provisional registry." >> >> That avoids overlapping values. > >Just for the record: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3864.txt, section 4.3
Excellent. I gave up grepping for "same" after the first couple of hits. I agree that Graham should just go ahead and ask IANA to remove the re- dundant entry (I'd have done that, copying ietf-message-headers, had I found the text above). -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[email protected] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
