On 13/02/2013 20:32, SM wrote:
Hi Julian,
At 12:24 13-02-2013, Julian Reschke wrote:
You make it sound as if it's ok to run two different registries with partly
overlapping values. It's not. It's a bug in the way IANA handles this. This is
what needs to be fixed.
It's easier to fix the bug first.
The following could be used:
"When a new entry is recorded in the permanent message header field
registry, IANA will remove any corresponding entries (with the same
field name and protocol) from the provisional registry."
That avoids overlapping values.
Just for the record:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3864.txt, section 4.3
#g
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
