On 10/2/07, Tim Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:24 -0400, Brandorr wrote: > > In order to gauge interest in the various topics we have discussed the > > concept of polling of or voting by the Summit attendees. > > > In my research I came across this list, which seems to be a very > > recent compilation of free polling websites: > > http://mashable.com/2007/08/06/online-polling/ > > I picked one of these at random, and generated: > > http://snappoll.com/poll/222656.php > > which looks fine to me - how much complexity do we need, would this site > be sufficient ?
It all depends on what we want to ask people. If we are just going to present a list of topics and ask people to vote for the ones that they view as ciritcal, most of these sites will work. My understanding is that the topics have already been narrowed down, and we would like to guage interest in the already scheduled topics, in order to work out the logistics. Maybe we really should do number one, to see if we are matching expectations? Sara, what say you? -Brian (Keep in mind this isn't a constitutional vote, so a little wiggle room is fine.) > > cheers, > tim > > > -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/ _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
