On Tue 02 Oct 2007 at 02:44PM, Brandorr wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Tim Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 14:24 -0400, Brandorr wrote:
> > > In order to gauge interest in the various topics we have discussed the
> > > concept of polling of or voting by the Summit attendees.
> >
> > > In my research I came across this list, which seems to be a very
> > > recent compilation of free polling websites:
> > > http://mashable.com/2007/08/06/online-polling/
> >
> > I picked one of these at random, and generated:
> >
> > http://snappoll.com/poll/222656.php
> >
> > which looks fine to me - how much complexity do we need, would this site
> > be sufficient ?
>
> It all depends on what we want to ask people. If we are just going to
> present a list of topics and ask people to vote for the ones that they
> view as ciritcal, most of these sites will work.
>
> My understanding is that the topics have already been narrowed down,
> and we would like to guage interest in the already scheduled topics,
> in order to work out the logistics.
Why not just use the existing voting system? I think it has basically
all of the facilities needed, and it integrates with our existing
authentication, and supports voting for multiple choices, and you
can ask as many questions as a you like.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
