Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Actually, I believe it was a decision of the Advocacy community as a > workaround of the website design "features" that gave them no other > way to give user group leaders a section of the website they could edit > without making them Advocacy Community "Leaders" who managed the entire > community web pages.
That's true, the design of the website software largely followed the lead of the proposed constitution, so when the Advocacy community came to do their thing with user groups they had to shoehorn them into the existing structures. If the OGB thinks that in the future we will need to provide facilities for more collective types than Community Groups and Projects, we will certainly try to make sure that we provide whatever is required. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
