Michelle Olson wrote: > The site content currently is authored in TML (a wiki-like markup) or > HTML, which is very awesome because it allows you to do either, > depending on your preference. Layout is definitely also something > contributors need to deal with.
The use of raw HTML on the current site may make it easy to get your particular page to layout just how you like it, but in every other way it's pretty much a bad thing. We have lots of pages which have HTML formatting tags in them - for example 937 pages have FONT tags and/or font CSS attributes in them, and even ones with Javascript embedded in the page content. This means that it is virtually impossible to re-skin the site in a consistent way, and the ability to embed Javascript opens up a range of security issues. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
