Garrett D'Amore writes: > As a "stop-gap", I'd be happy if the redacted case materials could be > restricted to just the materials that have the incorrect assertion, > rather than redacting the entire case just because some (useless IMO) > ARC coordinator or .ms source file contains evil language in it somewhere.
The previous mechanism was indeed a file-by-file exclusion. Is the new one really a ban on the whole case because one file is bad? If so, then that's a much more drastic issue, and one that should be relatively simple to fix. "Please don't do that." -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
