Have gmail accounts been blacklisted from posting? Please help me interpret this bounce email. Is this a transient issue?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-dae...@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: storycraf...@gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: opensolaris-disc...@opensolaris.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 554 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [74.125.83.178] blocked using recent.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net; Spam Received Recently See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?74.125.83.178 (state 14). ----- Original message ----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.231.12 with SMTP id d12mr2955107wfh.341.1279548644758; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.43.139 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:10:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4c441ffc.ktsxym60yepyv80n%joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <1375178860.291279406281236.javamail.tweb...@sf-app1> <4c441ffc.ktsxym60yepyv80n%joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:10:44 -0500 Message-ID: <aanlktil_mvgjchv0pnbwxuhx5su1lvlv2vxzvlhii...@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Community distro From: Mark Martin <storycraf...@gmail.com> To: Joerg Schilling <joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Cc: rlha...@smart.net, opensolaris-disc...@opensolaris.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Joerg Schilling <joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > "Richard L. Hamilton" <rlha...@smart.net> wrote: > >> A packaging system is a packaging system. IPS is nobody's favorite, >> but that's better than arguing the merits of rpm vs deb vs BSD ports vs ... > > The SVr4 packaging system understands http based URIs for the packages since > 2006. > > It does support the knowledge on dependencies since a long time... > If we add the inverted tsort algorith and a default prefix for packages > (e.g. http://schily.net/packages) and if we combine this with ZFS, > is there really something missing? > For me the question here is twofold: a) How important is it that there be an upgrade path for existing "The OpenSolaris(tm)" users? Is it important to us, collectively, that we continue the path that Sun led the community down via Indiana and IPS? Or can we say, "here, here are distros created by the real open community, but I'm afraid it isn't exactly aligned with the goals (whatever they were) of Indiana. Here's a laptop focused distro and a server one, but I'm afraid IPS isn't in them." b) If the answer to #1 isn't "Yes", can we collectively decide which is the right way to go? Can we get enough folks to compromise behind just *1* (community decided) strategy? Or has that ship sailed with Nexenta? I'm with you, Jörg, I think the community deserves the right to actually decide for itself this time around. Just 'cause Sun wanted to invent its own at the time doesn't mean we're stuck with that decision. _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list website-discuss@opensolaris.org
