Hi David, Am 29.12.2010 11:21, schrieb David Nelson:
> And then I was reading Stefan Siegel in a thread on the docs list, and > it sounds like he has rather different ideas about at least some of > the content on the libreoffice.org website. Well, it´s just my opinion. I do respect any other opinion. My statement, you are referring to, is not new. It´s part of my answer to your request from Dec 17. http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/msg01599.html > So, let me ask you the first question: > > a) Do I have broad consensus of permission from you for this January > 10 handover? Yes from me. But you have been asking for feedback already on Dec 17. My statement on the documentation list, you are referring to, was initiated by your proposal to delete a wiki page, that I would propose not to delete. > b) Are you happy with the content I've developed (and am still > continuing to develop)? Or am I going in a wrong direction? I am happy with it. And I am grateful, that you are doing this, otherwise we probably still wouldn´t have a even halfway presentable website yet. However, I have some points about the content, as mentioned: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/msg01599.html http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/msg00762.html > c) Do I really have a green light from the SC for this theme [1] [2]? > It's a heck of a lot of work and, if I do it, I want to be *sure* that > it is going to be used for the libreoffice.org site. So do I have a go > or a no-go? > > Please do give me clear explicit answers from you all. TIA. ;-) Are you asking the members of the SC only or does "you all" mean every reader on any list you are crossposting to? ;-) If I am asked: I think Nikashs proposal looks better, than what we have now. Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
