Hi Bernhard, *; On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Bernhard Dippold <[email protected]> wrote: > Christoph Noack schrieb: >> Am Freitag, den 21.01.2011, 17:36 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Dippold: >>> klaus-jürgen weghorn ol schrieb: >>>> Am 20.01.2011 01:38, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: >>>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:04 AM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Self-explanation: People will have to read the text to understand the >> item (and it needs to be translated?). And, the shape doesn't provide >> additional clues (direction). > > An (additional) arrow would be nice, but I don't know if it really works > without any textual explanation.
Added an arrow, but probably it's too small to be helpful... > What do you think of adding the link (not more prominent than at the moment) > with an additional upward arrow at the right *upper* corner of the text area > - directly below the navbar? > > PS: Concerning Fitt's law I don't know if we need to make this button more > visible and larger. As people know where to click when they want to scroll > up (upper arrow besides the website's content area), they will look at this > position to place the mouse. Well - before they can scroll up, they did scroll down, thus the cursor is at the bottom area (when using the scrollbar in ther first place). So I don't really think you can apply Fitt's law in either case. You did scroll down, want go up, cursor is already at the lower end of the scrollbar → bottom-right position would be OK. You and Christoph follow the other approach "the user wants to scroll up, thus he points to the upper-area of the scollbar because they're used to it", in this case the upper area would be better. I now changed it to be at top-right instead of bottom-right, so you get a feeling for it. ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
