Hi * Am 22.01.2011 02:40, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Bernhard Dippold > <[email protected]> wrote: >> An (additional) arrow would be nice, but I don't know if it really works >> without any textual explanation. > Added an arrow, but probably it's too small to be helpful...
It does help, arrow + top is common and easy to understand. >> What do you think of adding the link (not more prominent than at the moment) >> with an additional upward arrow at the right *upper* corner of the text area >> - directly below the navbar? >> PS: Concerning Fitt's law I don't know if we need to make this button more >> visible and larger. As people know where to click when they want to scroll >> up (upper arrow besides the website's content area), they will look at this >> position to place the mouse. > Well - before they can scroll up, they did scroll down, thus the > cursor is at the bottom area (when using the scrollbar in ther first > place). > So I don't really think you can apply Fitt's law in either case. > You did scroll down, want go up, cursor is already at the lower end of > the scrollbar → bottom-right position would be OK. Since there are some more possibilities to scroll while the cursor is anywhere on the page (e.g. arrow keys, mouse wheel, edge of touchpad) I find it hard to judge 'cursor will be here or there' in general. > You and Christoph follow the other approach "the user wants to scroll > up, thus he points to the upper-area of the scollbar because they're > used to it", in this case the upper area would be better. > I now changed it to be at top-right instead of bottom-right, so you > get a feeling for it. Looking at it as a visibility issue I'd prefer this location. cheers Erich -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
