On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:34 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi Drew, *, > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:26 PM, drew <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:04 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press > >> Productions <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > "https://dvd.north-america.libreofficebox.org/home/en/"; > >> > > >> > I found the part of the CSS that causes the right side of the page to be > >> > hidden. > >> > Why this "hidden"option is needed. > >> > >> a) You *must not* use <div id="Layout"> in your html, there is already > >> one div with that ID as part of the default layout, and you cannot > >> have two elements with the same ID in html, this is not valid. Same > >> for the other divs you did duplicate (BgContainer, Container, the > >> Header) > >> b) And you have an additional div class="typography", this again is > >> autogenerated, and is set to the full width of the page. When you have > >> additional elements on the left, then it doesn't fit anymore. > >> > >> So the problem is you're "misusing" predefined/special css styles and > >> have hard formatting in your html. > > > > Well, when the original HTML files where made they weren't in the CMS > > system so there was no misuse of anything, per so. > > Well, let me be more clear: what is stored in the CMS is not the > complete body, as this would make it impossible to create the > navigation dynamic, to have a common header, footer, etc. > What is stored in the CMS is the "real" content only. But what was > added in your sample was the complete body, duplicateing the header > and whatnot.
thanks for explaining that. > > It's pretty clear from the structure, that a page that was created by > the CMS was taken as a "template", but you just did copy too much. Absolutely right, that became very clear when I started looking at this. > For the default page type, only what is wihin the <div > class="typography"> is part of the CMS (minus the header (<h2>)that is > also taken from the page automatically) @Tim - I know the page that came back after the fix the other day looks like hell - but no one is going to leave it like that. I maybe should of put a nice looking landing page there, but I figured it was just Ugly for a few days and better to get the files we need to like to moved and rearranged first. //drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
