On Friday April 24 2009 11:00:51 Jeff Trawick wrote:
> David Soria Parra wrote:
> > I do not know much about python, but I think it is not a good idea to
> > use 2.6. In 2.6 a lot of functions were deprecated to make people aware
> > what will change in 3.0. Therefore a lot of deprecated warnings are
> > thrown in python applications. Mercurial had some issues with that in
> > the lsat weeks and I guess it's not the online app that has problems
> > with that.
>
> interesting... there's plenty of information that considers 2.6 to be
> backwards compatible, but most references don't mention the extra
> deprecation warnings
>
> something I noticed (checked in OpenSolaris b111a): amp-dev depends on
> SUNWpython-twisted which depends on SUNWpython (2.4)... b111a has a
> SUNWpython25-twisted but not a SUNWpython26-twisted
>
> I dunno exactly which Python ancillary packages in the base repo we
> consider to be part of the web stack anyway. The web stack repo has a
> number of python packages, and they depend on SUNWpython (2.4).
I am planning to update the webstack repo python packages to depend on
SUNWpython 2.6 for the 2009.06 release.
>
> > David
> >
> > Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >> It looks like Python 2.6 (SUNWpython26) has the fewest anciliary
> >> packages, Python 2.5 has a few more (SUNWpython25-twisted-web2,
> >> SUNWpython25-simplejson, SUNWpython25-cssutils, SUNWpython25-twisted,
> >> SUNWlibpigment-python25), and Python 2.4 has by far the most.
> >>
> >>
> >> (Try "pkg search -r python2.x", where x is {4,5,6})
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >> webstack-discuss mailing list
> >> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> webstack-discuss mailing list
> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
