Brian Overstreet wrote: > On Friday April 24 2009 11:00:51 Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> David Soria Parra wrote: >> >>> I do not know much about python, but I think it is not a good idea to >>> use 2.6. In 2.6 a lot of functions were deprecated to make people aware >>> what will change in 3.0. Therefore a lot of deprecated warnings are >>> thrown in python applications. Mercurial had some issues with that in >>> the lsat weeks and I guess it's not the online app that has problems >>> with that. >>> >> interesting... there's plenty of information that considers 2.6 to be >> backwards compatible, but most references don't mention the extra >> deprecation warnings >> >> something I noticed (checked in OpenSolaris b111a): amp-dev depends on >> SUNWpython-twisted which depends on SUNWpython (2.4)... b111a has a >> SUNWpython25-twisted but not a SUNWpython26-twisted >> >> I dunno exactly which Python ancillary packages in the base repo we >> consider to be part of the web stack anyway. The web stack repo has a >> number of python packages, and they depend on SUNWpython (2.4). >> > I am planning to update the webstack repo python packages to depend on > SUNWpython 2.6 for the 2009.06 release. >
Does it matter that there's no SUNWpython26-twisted, SUNWpython26-twisted-web2, etc., unlike for Python 2.5?
