Prashant Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi Chris, thanks.  comments inlined.
>
> -> I don't see the depend file from SUNWruby18u show up in the code 
> review, so that's probably still pointing to 1.8.6 p110 and needs 
> changing.
I have update depend of SUNWruby18u, just for the name of SUNWruby18r.
> -> pkginfo.tmpl needs changing per Amanda's comment
Done for both SUNWruby18r and SUNWruby18u.
> -> I'm curious about why you reordered the application of the 
> patches(Not that it matters functionality wise.)
I reordered the patch sequence of  ruby-sparc-perf.patch and 
ruby-dtrace-1.8.6.patch, as ruby-dtrace-1.8.6.patch is only for x86, so 
the source code will be different in x86 and sparc after patching 
ruby-dtrace-1.8.6.patch,  although gpatch can find the right place to 
patch the following patches, I  prefer to putting it as the last patch 
which will make the code clear in the new ruby patch version.
> -> Thanks for removing the unnecessary "cd ../.."s from the patching 
> code.
> -> Why is there a line inserted into the man page?
No, it's just an update of the patch line info.
> -> I logged into your machine, and you've upgraded the machine to use 
> your test ruby 1.8.6 p287 packages.  Not a good idea, since Adam and I 
> are also using the machine to for Ruby work.  Create a whole root zone 
> to test your packages.
Sorry for it. I will take care.
> -> It seems like you started from p110 rather than the p230 
> integration - It's a good idea to run a nightly sooner rather than 
> later to make sure all the added files into the prototype have been 
> included in the packages.
Yes, the nightly have completed successfully.

Chris
>
> -ps
>
> Chris Zhu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please help to review the CR6721879 
>> <http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsp?cr=6721879> Ruby patch level 
>> update to p287.
>>
>> And the webrev is ready on 
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~chriszhu/CR6721879-webrev/
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Chris
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>> webstack-discuss mailing list
>> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>>   
>
>


Reply via email to