Lars-Erik Bj?rk wrote: > Hi all! > > I am working in Sun's Database Group, and we have been planning to > include a Ruby interface to PostgreSQL, ruby-pg in Nevada. I have read > the discussion in your mail archives regarding including Rails with > Nevada, and we are currently facing the same issues you did. > ( http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=52256 ) > > It seems like you have settled for not including Rails, but leave it to > the user to do ' gem install '. Is this the approach you would suggest > to every ruby extension, or are you working on a different approach? >
Lars, that's correct. We'd run into packaging conflicts. It seems best to allow the "gem install <gem-name>" usage for all the reasons in theabove mentioned thread. The Postgres native extension should be buildable out of the box from b88 if Gopal can get his rbconfig changes checked in today. Else this should happen by b89. -ps > Any input would be greatly appreciated! > > Best regards, > Lars-Erik Bj?rk > > _______________________________________________ > > > webstack-discuss mailing list > webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss > -- Prashant Srinivasan F/OSS Enthusiast Sun Microsystems, Inc. http://blogs.sun.com/prashant GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x82FBDE5A
