So, how do you solve the problems with support? Do you have any solutions for this?
/Lars-Erik Prashant Srinivasan wrote: > Lars-Erik Bj?rk wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I am working in Sun's Database Group, and we have been planning to >> include a Ruby interface to PostgreSQL, ruby-pg in Nevada. I have read >> the discussion in your mail archives regarding including Rails with >> Nevada, and we are currently facing the same issues you did. >> ( http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=52256 ) >> It seems like you have settled for not including Rails, but leave it to >> the user to do ' gem install '. Is this the approach you would suggest >> to every ruby extension, or are you working on a different approach? >> > > Lars, that's correct. We'd run into packaging conflicts. It seems > best to allow the "gem install <gem-name>" usage for all the reasons > in theabove mentioned thread. > > The Postgres native extension should be buildable out of the box from > b88 if Gopal can get his rbconfig changes checked in today. Else this > should happen by b89. > -ps > > >> Any input would be greatly appreciated! >> >> Best regards, >> Lars-Erik Bj?rk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> webstack-discuss mailing list >> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >> > >
