Jeff Trawick wrote: > Amanda Waite wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I see that OpenLDAP in SFW has an interface stability of volatile. As >> I plan to have Lighttpd consume the OpenLDAP interfaces I would guess >> that I need to have an agreement in place with the OpenLDAP owners >> (as per OpenSSL). Has anyone else had to tackle this? If so do you >> know who I should talk to (i.e.: who owns OpenLDAP?) to setup such an >> agreement? > > I own OpenLDAP. I don't think any agreement can take place for > volatile interfaces.
With OpenSSL, for Lighttpd we weren't allowed to import the OpenSSL interface (due to it's stability of volatile) until we had signed an agreement with the guys that owned it that meant that they had to notify us of any changes to OpenSSL before they were made. I'm not sure if this is a standard process for importing volatile interfaces or just a one-off for OpenSSL (would be strange if it were a one-off though). We are on the same team so maybe it's not relevant here. > > Can you indicate which OpenLDAP interfaces need to be committed, from > a Lighttpd perspective? None, I'm fine with them as volatile, this is just due diligence. Last time, I got as far as the C-Team review only for them to tell me that I had to get this agreement signed for OpenSSL. Amanda > > _______________________________________________ > > > webstack-discuss mailing list > webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
