ok for the point: "hidden" is... hidden in the name of the step. I'm not really happy with emulate, pseudo and simulate. Perhaps fakeXxx?
Marc. Paul King wrote: > Marc Guillemot wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm quite unhappy with the name of the field emulateSetHiddenInputField. >> >> Why "emulate"? Why not simply setHiddenInputField? > > > If the user could normally trigger this by using some action then > we should drop the emulate. But this can never be triggered directly > by the user. It is only provided for when tricky javascript is not > working. The ideal is that we get the javascript working so a longer > ugly name is probably a good thing. > > Alternatives: pseudoXXX, simulateXXX > > Paul. > > > _______________________________________________ > WebTest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest > > _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
