What about forceXxx?
Paul.
Marc Guillemot wrote:
ok for the point: "hidden" is... hidden in the name of the step.
I'm not really happy with emulate, pseudo and simulate. Perhaps fakeXxx?
Marc.
Paul King wrote:
Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi,
I'm quite unhappy with the name of the field emulateSetHiddenInputField.
Why "emulate"? Why not simply setHiddenInputField?
If the user could normally trigger this by using some action then
we should drop the emulate. But this can never be triggered directly
by the user. It is only provided for when tricky javascript is not
working. The ideal is that we get the javascript working so a longer
ugly name is probably a good thing.
Alternatives: pseudoXXX, simulateXXX
Paul.
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
