That'd be perfect for me Dierk
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc Guillemot > Sent: Dienstag, 22. August 2006 10:20 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Webtest] Releasing 2.1 to go further? > > > Hi, > > since too many time I talk from what will be possible (with properties, > report, memory consumption, ...) once WebTest will correctly use > UnknownElement instead of forcing instantiation of the tasks at the > beginning of <webtest>. Most of the work is done on my computer since a > long time. I compare the report generated with the "current" version to > the one generated by the "future" version and the remaining problems are > only in the filters steps. > As it would already bring advantages and to allow other > committers/contributors to help finishing the work, I'd like to commit > this work (my laptop isn't a Dell, but I still dislike having these > changes only on my harddisk ;-)). > > My proposition would be to release WebTest 2.1 with current state, then > I could commit all my changes and we would add extra explanations on the > download page to warn about the not fully finished changes until they're > fully fixed. > > What do you think? > > Marc. > > _______________________________________________ > WebTest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
