As it seems to be ok, when could you do it?
Marc.
PS: a branch could be a possibility but would require more time, no
cruise control is already available, ...
Denis N. Antonioli wrote:
On 22 août 06, at 10:20, Marc Guillemot wrote:
Hi,
since too many time I talk from what will be possible (with
properties, report, memory consumption, ...) once WebTest will
correctly use UnknownElement instead of forcing instantiation of the
tasks at the beginning of <webtest>. Most of the work is done on my
computer since a long time. I compare the report generated with the
"current" version to the one generated by the "future" version and the
remaining problems are only in the filters steps.
As it would already bring advantages and to allow other
committers/contributors to help finishing the work, I'd like to commit
this work (my laptop isn't a Dell, but I still dislike having these
changes only on my harddisk ;-)).
You could make a branch for it ;-)
My proposition would be to release WebTest 2.1 with current state,
then I could commit all my changes and we would add extra explanations
on the download page to warn about the not fully finished changes
until they're fully fixed.
What do you think?
+1
dna
--A theory has only the alternative of being right or wrong. A model
has a third possibility: it may be right but irrelevant.
-- Manfred Eigen_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
_______________________________________________
WebTest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
