A stupid question: what would this bring? Marc.
Ed Smith-3 wrote: > > JWebUnit 2.X proposes the interesting idea of plugins. You specify tests > in JWebUnit lingo, but how the test is performed depends on the plugin. > You can choose from HTMLUnit or Selenium as your "real" tester. Of > course, this is all theoretical in JWebUnit as version 2.X isn't even > working. Has any consideration been given to taking this approach with > WebTest? > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated > for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow > _______________________________________________ > WebTest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JWebUnit-style-plugin-tf3873622.html#a10986626 Sent from the WebTest mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
