The ability to test both in a simulated client (HTMLUnit) and a variety of "real" clients with a single test. If my application fails with IE, I can complaint all I want about its noncompliance with publish standards, but the majority of my users will still be angry with me. Selenium is great for this kind of testing. Of course, I may want to run continuous testing with HTMLUnit because it doesn't posses a browser.
----- Original Message ---- From: Marc Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 6:19:51 AM Subject: Re: [Webtest] JWebUnit style plugin A stupid question: what would this bring? Marc. Ed Smith-3 wrote: > > JWebUnit 2.X proposes the interesting idea of plugins. You specify tests > in JWebUnit lingo, but how the test is performed depends on the plugin. > You can choose from HTMLUnit or Selenium as your "real" tester. Of > course, this is all theoretical in JWebUnit as version 2.X isn't even > working. Has any consideration been given to taking this approach with > WebTest? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
