Hi Ken, > ... > I have recently had some words here with engineers about that other, > chemical element testing framework. They want it because then they > don't have to fix the JS errors in the code. But I picked WebTest > partly *because* it detects those errors. So far my choice has > prevailed.
in fact WebTest allows you both options: fail on JS errors or ignore them. The default setting is to fail on JS errors because we consider that they denote a problem in the application that should be fixed ASAP (and that is cheaper to fix early). Nevertheless you sometimes need to ignore JS errors when you don't have easy access to the sources (third party library or testing done - too - late). > If there are any other experts out there floating around who would like > to work in SF, maybe a private inbox would be good .. especially if they > also know some JUnit. SF is quite far away ;-) Remote? Cheers, Marc. -- Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
