+1

Do they folks at Canoo have any stats on how many users of Webtest there are?  
How many downloads are occurring?, Etc.?  Does Canoo still use Webtest in their 
projects?

From: Martin Huber <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Martin Huber 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2014 at 10:29 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated to use 
htmlunit 2.14 ?

Hi all,

WebTest is OpenSource as you know. If we would move the source code to GitHub 
and make it easier for the community to do contributions on their own – would 
some of you be able / willing to spend time in contributing?
I also believe it would be very sad to let WebTest die as its core idea and 
concept still are very valid and helpful even in actual development projects.

Could you give some feedback about if you could contribute?
Just send a “+1” to the list, so we see, if it will be worth moving the project.

Cheers,
Martin


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Zwick
Sent: Donnerstag, 20. März 2014 14:18
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated to use 
htmlunit 2.14 ?

It’s quite the same for me. I’m still using Webtest. I think, it’s a very good 
tool. So far I could cover all I wanted with it. Ease of use, reporting, 
possibilities to structure the tests and reusing packages, all that is just 
fine.
So, I don’t like to see it just fade away like that. Still I’m thinking about 
moving over to another tool as there is no activity or progress anymore.

Michael


From:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dwayne Miller
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:48 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated to use 
htmlunit 2.14 ?

I happen to like using Webtest and find it truly disappointing that the product 
has slipped into the state is has.  I wonder if the sponsors would be willing 
to donate it or host it elsewhere… or if that would even help.  It is difficult 
for me to gauge the level of interest or use in the product via this mailing 
list.  It was once much more active and leads me to believe that most have 
moved to another tool.  I work with a test team that are not developers, and 
the ability to write test scripts using Ant XML is much easier for them to 
grasp than writing Java code.

I was able to get a version of Webtest running on htmlunit 2.12.  But the 
changes in 2.14 and dependencies are a little more daunting and I have not had 
the time required to get a good feel for how all of the pieces work together so 
that I can make updates.

From: Parkin Roman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Organization: Texuna Technologies Ltd
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 at 9:47 AM
To: Webtest <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Webtest] What are the chances that webtest will be updated to use 
htmlunit 2.14 ?

Hi all,

Webtest uses htmlunit 2.10.
What are the chances that webtest will be updated to use htmlunit 2.14
or we should migrate to other tools for automated testing of web applications?
--
Best regards,
Roman Parkin
Testing Team Lead
Texuna Technologies Ltd<http://www.texunatech.com>
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information which is 
privileged, confidential, proprietary, or exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible 
for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are strictly 
prohibited from disclosing, distributing, copying, or in any way using this 
message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
sender and destroy and delete any copies you may have received.

Reply via email to