At 12:16 PM 5/29/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>I'll bet some of the problems in AsyncThreadedHTTPServer would be easier
>to fix using ThreadedAppServer as the base instead of Async, just because
>it's simpler. It'll just take somebody's time to do the rewrite.
[snip]
>No objection, just wait until someone has time to switch the HTTP server
>to Threaded before completely axing the code. I _might_ have time to do
>it but I'd love for someone else to step up and give it a shot.
Another thought is to skip that approach and go straight for allowing
AppSever to listen on multiple ports, each with it's own protocol. Then
serving HTTP (FTP, BXXP, whatever) becomes an issue of a request handler
and some configuration.
I always wanted that in the first place and others, like Terrel, have
voiced their desire for this approach.
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
