At 12:38 PM 5/29/01 -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
>At 12:16 PM 5/29/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>>I'll bet some of the problems in AsyncThreadedHTTPServer would be easier
>>to fix using ThreadedAppServer as the base instead of Async, just because
>>it's simpler. It'll just take somebody's time to do the rewrite.
>
>[snip]
>
>
>>No objection, just wait until someone has time to switch the HTTP server
>>to Threaded before completely axing the code. I _might_ have time to do
>>it but I'd love for someone else to step up and give it a shot.
>
>Another thought is to skip that approach and go straight for allowing
>AppSever to listen on multiple ports, each with it's own protocol. Then
>serving HTTP (FTP, BXXP, whatever) becomes an issue of a request handler
>and some configuration.
>
>I always wanted that in the first place and others, like Terrel, have
>voiced their desire for this approach.
Agreed -- that's a much better approach.
--
- Geoff Talvola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
