At 01:52 PM 6/8/2001 -0400, Geoff Talvola wrote:
>I just noticed that the documentation for PSP specifies the following syntax:
>
>If you want to include another PSP file in this PSP file and have it be
>parsed for PSP content:
><%@include file="myfile.txt"%>
>
>If you want to forward the request to another servlet, including the
>result in the output:
><psp:include file="myfile.psp">
It looks strange that <[EMAIL PROTECTED] and <psp:include... have extremely
different semantics. And why is one prefixed with "@" and the other with
"psp:"? Why are they both called "include" if they do something different?
I don't use *SP much in practice, so I don't take the semantics or syntax
for granted.
Sorry if this is already explained in the docs, but it points at that at
first glance this seems rather arcane.
>If you want to insert a file verbatim into the output:
><psp:insert file="myfile.html">
>
>But, it turns out that you actually have to use <psp:include
>path="myfile.psp">. The other two ones do work as advertised with "file=".
>
>Any objections to making all three of them use file=, to be consistent
>with each other and with the documentation?
No objection from me, but I'm really bothered by what I noticed above.
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
