No, it should be "path" for psp:include. I just haven't updated the
documentation. @include includes the source of a file, psp:include
actually does a application.includeURL call.
Jay
Geoff Talvola wrote:
> I just noticed that the documentation for PSP specifies the following
> syntax:
>
> If you want to include another PSP file in this PSP file and have it
> be parsed for PSP content:
> <%@include file="myfile.txt"%>
>
> If you want to forward the request to another servlet, including the
> result in the output:
> <psp:include file="myfile.psp">
>
> If you want to insert a file verbatim into the output:
> <psp:insert file="myfile.html">
>
> But, it turns out that you actually have to use <psp:include
> path="myfile.psp">. The other two ones do work as advertised with
> "file=".
>
> Any objections to making all three of them use file=, to be consistent
> with each other and with the documentation?
>
>
> --
>
> - Geoff Talvola
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
