> Geoff wrote:
> >- Many of the differences in your design sound very similar
> >to the multi-app stuff that Jay has been working on.
>
> I haven't looked closely at Jay's implementation, but many
> the design ideas are the same. If we go ahead with
> finishing this refactoring off it would be great to go
> through the equivalent classes of the two implementations
> and synthesize the best elements.
>
> Jay, what was the URL again? Did you get anymore feedback?
ftp://ftp.jslove.org/pub
>
> Also, can you spot any obvious flaws in the way output
> streaming is handled in this code?
I haven't looked at that yet.
>
> > - Distutils support is a good thing.
>
> Good :-) Unfortunately, refactoring for Distutils makes
> patching against the existing code-base in the CVS rather
> difficult. The directory structure is different and most
> of the changes are highly interrelated.
I agree that Disutils is good. I just haven't looked at the tavis directory
structure vs. the current to see what changes are required and why.
>
> What's the best way to proceed from here? I'd like to get
> this code into a CVS somewhere so it's not just me
> tinkering around and making arbritary design decisions.
> Getting it in a CVS would allow division of labour on this.
> We could flesh out the TODO list and claim sections of it
> to work on. Should we setup a new branch in the Webware
> CVS or a temporary sourceforge project with a separate CVS?
> I prefer the former as it emphasizes the similarities and
> prevents people from getting the impression that this is a
> fork.
I still don't know that we want to make a chanage this large at this point.
I would like to go through the code more completely and see what tradeoffs
are being made and why. After just a quick glance, I can see things I like
in the tavis code, but plenty I don't as well. I'll come up with a more
thourough discussion of those points once I've finished reading and
comparing.
Jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged.
If you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you
should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are
prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information
contained herein. Please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return
e-mail.
Thank you for your cooperation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
