At 07:08 AM 5/29/2001 -0700, Mike Orr wrote: >On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 07:26:10AM -0400, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > It's been on my list to give it a better name and possibly put it > somewhere > > else. Maybe WebKit/Aux/webkit_init > >"aux" is a device name in Windows (at least 95/98), so any tarball >containing it won't unpack. Hahaha. Woops. How about? Auxiliary Accessories Additions I prefer the first. -Chuck _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
- [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Manfred Nowak
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Mike Orr
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Manfred Nowak
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Tavis Rudd
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Baruch Even
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Mike Orr
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Baruch Even
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Ian Bicking
- Re: [Webware-discuss] WebKit at WWW Baruch Even
