At 04:26 PM 10/31/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Tavis Rudd wrote: > > >>Yes, and no. It is common to use PSP for the frontend and do all the >backend processing in pure Python classes that are inherited by the PSP >classes. MS calls this the 'code-behind' method with ASP. While PSP is >better than pure Python for the front-end stuff, there are alternatives >that are better suited for this task.<< > > >When is PSP more appropriate than Cheetah in the Webware context? If >Cheetah is the preferred templating solution, why not just bundle it with >Webware too? > >...Edmund.
I think PSP is appropriate for a "developer-only" scenario where the only people who have to deal with the PSP files are Python programmers. It lets you just think in terms of Python syntax, all the time, instead of switching between Python syntax and Cheetah's different syntax. If you're going to bring in non-programmers to work on the design, then Cheetah is clearly a better option. -- - Geoff Talvola [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
