On Tuesday 02 April 2002 12:59, Tavis Rudd wrote: > On Tuesday 02 April 2002 11:01, Geoffrey Talvola wrote: > > If we could decouple the changes from each other, and have a > > separate discussion of the merits of each proposed change, then > > phase in the new features gradually as patches, then I could see > > a path for migrating Webware towards what Tavis has done. It'd > > probably have to be Tavis who does most of the work to create > > those patches.
How about starting with the distutils stuff? It's one part that should be fairly easy to isolate and apply to the official codebase as a patch. I'll do some work on this later this week. I'd appreciate any comments on the code (thanks Jeff) and the ideas behind it. The test code is a higher priority, but it's alot harder to isolate. > Honestly, I'm not interested in doing all the work myself :) I've > written and tested these refactorings myself. There's months of > work in there. Now it's up to other people to at least look at the > code and comment on it. Then we can decide how to proceed. ... lots of thanks to Mike and Geoff who have done quite a bit of testing and review of this thing over the past half year. Cheers Tavis _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
