Kendall Clark wrote: > At this point, this is wildly premature optimization talk, so I'll > stop. :> (Er, not before mentioning that libxml2 has nice Python > bindings now, and PyRXP is fast as bloody hell and has fairly decent > memory usage; both require 3rd party C code, but such is life.)
PyRXP is only 14,000 lines of actual code, mostly broken into small pieces of code except for xmlparser.c, and is GPL'ed, so shouldn't be a big heartache. Compare that to 100,000 lines of C code in libxml2 :( -- Bill Eldridge Radio Free Asia [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
