On 10/29/2002 01:53:01 PM Stuart wrote: >At the risk of annoying some people, I think the idea of using the reverse >domain name in packages is a good idea to avoid any potential problems.
This presupposes a package will always be associated with a specific domain name, and that the domain name will be around unchanged forever. Here's an example of where this wouldn't work... Suppose package X is developed by a company at domain company.com. Then, the company loses interest in the package, and drops it, but allows someone else to take it over. Should the package still retain the original domain name? I don't think so since the company is no longer associated with the package, and may not want to be for legal or other reasons. ...Edmund. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
