On 10/29/2002 06:08:47 PM Stuart wrote: >I don't think the example cited negates the idea of using domain names. >I would say that if a package is dropped by one vendor, and picked up by >another, that it is perfectly reasonable for the package to adopt a new >name. Furthermore, in an open source environment, you could even use >something like net.sf.webware.mypackage for a name.
Sounds like a recipe for unnecessary confusion... I don't quite see the need to bring in the source of a package into its name. Doesn't really seem to add enough to justify the potential confusion. ...Edmund. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
