Just to add my 2 cents.

I haven't found any stability or leakyness issues.  I have a webware
server that has been running uninterupted for over a year now.  The
memory usage has stayed level and it keeps chugging along even though it
handles a reasonable load every day.  Also, it powers mostly PSP pages
that the designers are updating on a regular basis, and are constantly
causing exceptions on.


- Aaron Switzer



On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 22:47, Shayne ONeill wrote:
> Perhaps. I definately agree on the performance aspect. My personal concern
> is a stability one. Basically I just dont believe the servlet model can
> offer the same sort of stability that the one-hit page model can,
> principally because on a php page, if the code raises an exception, it'll
> flatten the page, not the server. There can also be issues with locking ,
> 'leakyness' (not *really* as big a problem with python, but I've seen it
> in java servlets despite the touted magic of garbage collection).
> 
> Finally I do believe webware is not too hard to kill. I'm sadly having to
> reboot the webware install I maintain pretty regularly.
> 
> Now all that aside , heres why I persevere: Webware is good! The webkit
> offers a pretty straight forward way to generate persistant servlet stylee
> without horrible.java.abstact.compsci.evil brain hurt. Its pythonic and
> pythonic is nice.
> 
> Any process control stuff is going to need a persistant process anyway.
> Maintaining serial connections, listening for state data from devices etc
> etc. One aproach has been a little more abstraction.
> 
> I put together a system for controling a large security camera network
> that works *imaculately* that had this;-
> 
> control data<---[pc]->control server<-[xml-rpc]---->interface
>                                                         |
> camera data <---[pc's]->storage<------[mjpeg streams]---+
> 
> the beauty of that, is that I had a php interface that could talk to the
> server while isolating the control server from 'idiot userfinger land'.
> I also put together a little delphi app that had dials and knobs and other
> eyecandy, and generally it was a functional well apreciated interface and
> worked well. The control server runs webware, but not for the web
> interface, but rather for xml-rpc. Strange hack granted, but the structure
> of webware suited the task perfectly.
> 
> Also handy: It needed no db :) I still cant wrap my head around making
> mysql threadsafe.
> 
> --
> Shayne O'Neill..   trådkrämare
> http://perth.indymedia.org
> "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldnt do my job."
> --George W Bush.
> http://atheism.about.com/b/a/099745.htm
> 
> 
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Winston Wolff wrote:
> 
> > I regularly run apache bench to test my website on my rather slow
> > 800MHz Mac.  It serves about 40 pages per second.  This is somewhat
> > faster than PHP runs, and 20 times faster than my old JSP/J2EE
> > application would run.  So I think performance of Webware is top notch.
> >   Also related to performance is reliability and I find Webware very
> > stable.  When one servlet raises an exception, it does not cause
> > problems for other parts of the website.  If the whole thing should go
> > down, then it will automatically restart.
> >
> > -winston
> >
> >
> > On Jan 20, 2005, at 11:05 AM, michelts wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys!
> > >
> > > I planning to make a system to automatizate the site factory. I use
> > > cheetah and webware, each site will have a standart look and feel, I
> > > will have several sites (the goal is to hit up to 1000 clients in one
> > > year), my worry is with the webware performance. Each site will have
> > > few acess, but grouping all the sites... I think it's about
> > >
> > > Is there a reason to worry or webware can handle this? Does anyone
> > > have a big site running under webware?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Michel Thadeu Sabchuk
> > > Curitiba - PR
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> > > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> > > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> > > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Webware-discuss mailing list
> > > Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > _________________________________________
> > winston wolff - (646) 827-2242 - http://www.stratolab.com - learning by
> > creating
> >
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
> Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
> by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
> Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-discuss mailing list
> Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Webware-discuss mailing list
Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss

Reply via email to