The clearinghouse is the Business Associate of the payer, and as such,
is empowered to do anything the payer wants it to do and could have done
for himself.  It's problematic if the converse is true:  could a payer
do for himself what is permissible for the business associate to do for
him? - like convert non-standard input to standard??!!

The concern would be irrelevant if the provider used a non-standard
claim in the first place - the "No Adverse effect" rule, � 162.925(a),
doesn't apply to non-standard transactions.

Your example of eligibility checking is what the FEE paper calls an
"Application Level Pre-Edit Result." By moving the edit to the
"front-end"  (how can you get any more "front-end" than the
clearinghouse?), you have actually saved the provider a lot of grief -
she potentially gets some kind of feedback sooner in the process, and
thus can expedite repairing her claim. I'd say that's goodness.

The transaction is not being rejected simply because it is a standard
transaction - a violation of �162.925(a) - but rather because the
patient is not eligible; it doesn't matter that the claim never made it
to adjudication or the back-end at the payer's site.  The claim would
presumably have been rejected (somewhere) even if it had arrived on
paper or in a non-standard format - thus preserving "equal-treatment" of
the standard transaction.

William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcallee Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WEDI SNIP Testing Subworkgroup List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 15 November, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: Payer Edits


Is it actually written somewhere that a payer can't reject a claim that
meets all the requirements of the implementation guide but not
adjudication edits they have pushed to the front-end?  For example, some
health plans provide eligibility files to clearinghouses that then
reject claims up front if the patient is not eligible.

Marcallee Jackson
562-438-6613


---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  
They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-testing as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the 
address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org

Reply via email to