John,
 
I'm well aware of how the X12 control segments work and that the BHT03 is "situational" under HIPAA. I've been an active member of the X12 Committee since 1987, and also an active member of the X12C, X12K (purchasing SC when it still existed), X12J Technical Assessment and now X12N Subcommittees.
 
Regardless, I still believe that it's not appropriate to change the business data within the transaction set. If the originator of the 270 inserts a value in BHT03 that original value must be maintained throughout the entire transaction set's lifecycle, from originator through clearinghouse (or VAN) to the payer and should be returned by the payer. My opinion is that this is a violation of data integrity requirements under any reasonable security scheme. Thus, the original value inserted into BHT03 by the originator should **not** be changed at every pit stop.
 
Rachel Foerster
-----Original Message-----
From: John Branwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 1:09 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Transactions Workgroup List
Subject: RE: Submitter Transaction Identifier - 270/271

Ellen..thanks for your response. That was very well explained.

Rachel...BHT03 is optional, assigned by the originator to identify the transaction within the originator's business application system and changed at every pit-stop. You don't have to use it if you don't need it. But, if you receive it you have to return it back on 271.

A Transaction set control no.(ST02 - Header) is required, unique within an interchange, and this is the no. which remains unchanged during the entire transaction flow between payer and provider.

Hope that helps.

J

 Rachel Foerster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What a mess! Why not just pass the originally received 270 intact on to the payer and back without modifying the data received from the originator? Actually, my opinion is that such a modification violates the basic data integrity of any information security policy and procedure: confidentiality, integrity, access.
 
The X12 standards have built into them in the various control segments and control data (date/time stamps, identifiers, control numbers) that clearinghouses, etc. can use for receiving, storing and forwarding transactions to the intended receiver. Other industries, including the medical products and pharmaceutical supply chains, that make extensive use of the EDI X12 standards don't fool around with the business data contained within a transaction set, and health care administrative simplification under HIPAA shouldn't do it either.
 
Rachel

Rachel Foerster
Principal
Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd.
Professionals in EDI & Electronic Commerce
39432 North Avenue
Beach Park, IL 60099
Voice: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rfa-edi.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Falbowski, Ellen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:44 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Transactions Workgroup List
Subject: RE: Submitter Transaction Identifier - 270/271

Provider assigns a number (say, 123) to the BHT03 and passes the 270 transaction to the clearinghouse.  Clearinghouse stores the provider's number and populates a new number (say, 456) before passing the 270 transaction to the payer.  Payer returns the 271 response with the clearinghouse's number (456).  Clearinghouse grabs the 271 transaction, re-populates the BHT03 with the provider's number (123) from the 270, and returns the 271 to provider.  This also works if the transaction travels through multiple clearinghouses.  It allows the clearinghouse to keep track of each response even when multiple providers assign the same number (a likely scenario).
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: John Branwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:28 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Transactions Workgroup List
Subject: Submitter Transaction Identifier - 270/271

My question is regarding Submitter Transaction Identifier(BHT03 - Header). The guide notes states -
".. This identifier is to be returned in the corresponding 271 transaction's BHT03. This identifier will only be returned by the last entity to handle the 270. This identifier will not be passed through the complete life of the transaction. All recipients of 270 transactions are required to return the Submitter Transaction Identifier in their 271 response if one is submitted."

Considering the following two statements :
1> This identifier will not be passed through the complete life of the transaction.
2> This is the number assigned by the originator to identify the
transaction within the originator's business application system.

My question is that for statement <2> to happen the provider needs to receive the same number back on 271. But, if the number doens't get passed throughout the lifecycle of the transaction(as stated in statement <1>), how will the provider receive it back on 271?
I am certainly missing something out here. Please comment and clarify.

Thanks in advance.

John

---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now --- The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time. You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org
---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org

Reply via email to